Not founded by EU: Own budget
Short description
With the 2015 short story on the Bundesvergabegesetz (BGBl I 7/2016) a first catalog was published, which was published in addition to the sale of public information on the basis of the "best-in-kind" principle. Damit muss der Auftraggeber (klassischer öffentlicher Auftraggeber und Sektorenauftraggeber) - neben dem Priis - zwingend zumindest ein zweites Zuschlagskriterium zur Ermittlung des zuünftigen Auftragnehmers einsetzen. Welche Critien bei einer Auschriibung konkret eingesetzt werden und wie sie zueinander gewichtet sind, gibt der Gesetzgeber (bewusst) nicht vor. Damit can be seen at the start of a meeting The festivities and weight of the best criteria, however, must be made in the framework of the public hands of the general public of the Sparsamkeit, Zweckmäßigkeit and Wirtschaftlichkeit des Einkaufs out. It is not always possible to provide the necessary construction, supply, and services from a technical, commercial and legal complex to its own and well-known and well-defined by Nachhal.
Aim
The initiative "FAIRE VERGABEN secure jobs!", Which from the beginning was a major initiator in the legal strengthening of the best bidder principle, especially in the construction sector, has set itself the goal of providing the contracting practitioners with an aid to the clients affected by the changes with which they can more easily implement the new legal requirements. The current best bidder criteria catalog therefore contains suggestions for qualitative award criteria for construction contracts with an estimated order value of more than 1 million euros (this is practically the most important "best bidder case" in the construction sector; however, the catalog also applies to all other "best bidder cases"). The award criteria listed as examples in the best bidder criteria catalog are mere (non-binding) handouts and do not claim to be generally valid or useful. It always remains the responsibility of the respective purchaser, which criteria are used against the background of a specific project and what importance these criteria are given in relation to the price. Liability of the authors or the “Faire Vergabe” initiative and its individual members is therefore expressly excluded. The best bidder criteria catalog only wants to draw attention to a number of possible qualitative criteria (the majority of them are already used in practice) and list the most essential requirements, but also pitfalls, if these qualitative criteria are used. The selection of the criteria is therefore inevitably subjective, which is why there are certainly many other qualitative award criteria in the construction sector that can be used sensibly. In this respect, the authors of the current best bidder criteria catalog encourage users to share their experience with other users, both when using the criteria outlined here and their experience with newly created criteria. In order to systematize the abundance of possible criteria for a joint discussion, a distinction is made between economic criteria, social criteria and environmental criteria in the present catalog of best bidder criteria.
Target groups
Replicability & Recommendations
Yes
https://www.linz.at/images/Bestbieterkatalog_fur_Gemeinden_Faire_Vergabe.pdf
https://www.wko.at/branchen/gewerbe-handwerk/bau/Bestbieterkriterien-Katalog.pdf
Vergabe24 | Öffentliche Ausschreibungen
Bestbieterkatalog_fur_Gemeinden_Faire-Vergabe_FINAL.pdf (faire-vergaben.at)